Next Generation Surgical Robots: Where's the Doctor? (Link to an article in ScienceDaily)
As new and more innovative technologies keep emerging some sectors of our society will take different forms. We have witnessed how machines have replaced men in many important areas of our lives: machines used in agriculture, robots being used in factories, answer machines taking messages just to mention a few. In this article, a new generation of surgical robots at its early stage can soon replace our doctors. A profession that has been around for a long time may soon come to an end. This article mentions that a robot "can locate a man-made, or phantom, lesion in simulated human organs." What makes it impressive? Well, these robots are not assisted by humans. This means that the robots are autonomous and can take their own decisions. This robot is not used in practice but it might replace our doctors soon. In my opinion, a smart machine should not replace a doctor especially when the machine is not supervised by a human. Machines should have the turn on/off feature because men should be able to control these smart machines. Imagine what would happen if this machines fail in the middle of a surgery? Having these advances in artificial intelligence is an area of opportunity for scientist and so we need to understand the problem that we are trying to solve with these technologies. We cannot give total trust to a machine. Having technologies that make it cheaper and easier for us to get a surgery is a good idea but they have to be operated and supervised by a human in case it fails. The operation of these robots is believed to be at an early stage because the lack of efficient algorithms and faster processors are on their way. There is more research to be done. One of the greatest challenges they found is the speed of data acquisition and processing. These are fields of great research around the world and we hope to have faster algorithms and processors so that we can see these robots operating at their full very soon. The development of these technologies is very important but researchers have to keep in mind that we cannot give total trust on decisions that can only be made by humans. We need to include the turn on/off feature so that we can control the technologies we create.
Thursday, August 5, 2010
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Scientists Worry Machines May Outsmart Man
Scientists Worry Machines May Outsmart Man (Link to an article in NYTimes)
Can you imagine living in a place where machines are more intelligent than humans? According to John Markoff, some concerns have been raised in the community of Computer Scientists and Artificial Intelligence researchers around the globe. Some of the researchers involved are alarmed by the constant improvements in technologies, and so are debating whether we should put limits to the creation of smart machines. One of the main reasons for having limits on these new technologies is the fact that "further advances could create profound social disruptions and even have dangerous consequences." We have to set limits because we need to have all these technological advancements under our control. It is ethically wrong to create machines that are totally autonomous and cannot be controlled by humans. Technologies in general, but specially smart machines must benefit humans not destroy or cause disruption in our daily lives. This raises an ethical question: Are humans being forced to "learn to live" with machines and computers? With the new technological advances humans have to find a way to interact with computers. Older people feel that society is trying to force them to interact somehow with computers. They feel left out of their own natural environment just because they have no idea on how to use a computer. This should not be the idea when designing new technologies. The interaction should be natural where any individual, no matter what his/her condition is, should be able to interact with a smart environment. Another thing designers and researchers need to keep in mind is the "turn on/off feature." Users should be able to control the machines. Another important aspect is the exploitation of artificial intelligence systems. Many of the benefits we get with the newly developed and researched technologies can be badly used against our human race. "What could a criminal do with a speech synthesis system that could masquerade as a human being? What happens if artificial intelligence technology is used to mine personal information from smart phones?" As we can see, advancements in Artificial Intelligence can bring a prosperous future but as new technologies are created, new ways of exploiting the vulnerabilities come along. After the conference that took place in California, USA, many experiments and projects around the the world have been halted. There is a need for ethical researchers and scientists that care about the future of humanity. Humans are more important than any technology. There is a need for a world-wide organization that regulates and sets some guidelines that protect the integrity of humans. In 1965 Good proposed that smart machines would design even smarter machines. This may sound sci-fi but if we do not set limits in the design of smart machines Good's proposal can become an uncomfortable reality. Some of the problems cause by the rise of these smart machines can bring "socioeconomic, legal and ethical issues." Human-computer relationship will probably change because as the author of the article says: "How would it be, for example, to relate to a machine that is as intelligent as your spouse?" This is very unfortunate but we need to be optimistic that Artificial Intelligence research will benefit humans and will improve the way we live. It is up to us, and so we need to participate in the development of future AI technologies.
Can you imagine living in a place where machines are more intelligent than humans? According to John Markoff, some concerns have been raised in the community of Computer Scientists and Artificial Intelligence researchers around the globe. Some of the researchers involved are alarmed by the constant improvements in technologies, and so are debating whether we should put limits to the creation of smart machines. One of the main reasons for having limits on these new technologies is the fact that "further advances could create profound social disruptions and even have dangerous consequences." We have to set limits because we need to have all these technological advancements under our control. It is ethically wrong to create machines that are totally autonomous and cannot be controlled by humans. Technologies in general, but specially smart machines must benefit humans not destroy or cause disruption in our daily lives. This raises an ethical question: Are humans being forced to "learn to live" with machines and computers? With the new technological advances humans have to find a way to interact with computers. Older people feel that society is trying to force them to interact somehow with computers. They feel left out of their own natural environment just because they have no idea on how to use a computer. This should not be the idea when designing new technologies. The interaction should be natural where any individual, no matter what his/her condition is, should be able to interact with a smart environment. Another thing designers and researchers need to keep in mind is the "turn on/off feature." Users should be able to control the machines. Another important aspect is the exploitation of artificial intelligence systems. Many of the benefits we get with the newly developed and researched technologies can be badly used against our human race. "What could a criminal do with a speech synthesis system that could masquerade as a human being? What happens if artificial intelligence technology is used to mine personal information from smart phones?" As we can see, advancements in Artificial Intelligence can bring a prosperous future but as new technologies are created, new ways of exploiting the vulnerabilities come along. After the conference that took place in California, USA, many experiments and projects around the the world have been halted. There is a need for ethical researchers and scientists that care about the future of humanity. Humans are more important than any technology. There is a need for a world-wide organization that regulates and sets some guidelines that protect the integrity of humans. In 1965 Good proposed that smart machines would design even smarter machines. This may sound sci-fi but if we do not set limits in the design of smart machines Good's proposal can become an uncomfortable reality. Some of the problems cause by the rise of these smart machines can bring "socioeconomic, legal and ethical issues." Human-computer relationship will probably change because as the author of the article says: "How would it be, for example, to relate to a machine that is as intelligent as your spouse?" This is very unfortunate but we need to be optimistic that Artificial Intelligence research will benefit humans and will improve the way we live. It is up to us, and so we need to participate in the development of future AI technologies.
Monday, July 12, 2010
Visual System Interprets Sign Languages
Visual System Interprets Sign Language (Link to an article in ScienceDaily)
Amazing article on how the development of new technologies can benefit people with different disabilities. This time students from the European Union in conjunction with the "Catalan Federation of Deaf People" developed a visual system that will help deaf people that use Spanish sign language make consultations in their language. What is interesting in this research is the fact that researchers are taking into consideration that signs can vary depending on each user. Another aspect that is very notorious is the ability of this system to translate sign language to real words in real-time. This feature allows deaf users to communicate using the simplest signs of the collection of sign language to establish a simple conversation with people that knows nothing about sign language. It makes use of very simple artifacts that we use in our daily lives such as a video camera. It captures images that are interpreted and matched with a sign. It is worth mentioning that this system can be scalable and adaptable to other sign languages. Its architecture allows other users to train the system to work with different sign languages. According to the author of the article, this system is designed with peculiar care due to the different contexts in which the system can be used. The researchers have worked hard to find a harmony between the environment that surrounds the system: light, shadows, speed at which the sign is made, etc. Even though this is a very promising project, designers of the visual system assured that it can not handle many signs yet. The reason is that it can confuse some signs but development is on its way. They are trying to implement the system using two cameras two recognize more complex signs. In conclusion, projects that make life easier for those that are unable to participate in our communities or have a special need are exceptional ways to show that we can reach a harmony between humans and the environment that surround us. These types of projects create an environment where humans can be sure that their dignity will be protected. Technologies that want to make humans less human are worthless. We need to focus on creating technologies that will make members of our society more human instead of degrading human nature. This is a good example of technologies that make good use of information contained in the context. This system responds to the presence of a deaf person and it is worth mentioning that this will allow those members with special needs to integrate in a more natural and human way to our society.
Amazing article on how the development of new technologies can benefit people with different disabilities. This time students from the European Union in conjunction with the "Catalan Federation of Deaf People" developed a visual system that will help deaf people that use Spanish sign language make consultations in their language. What is interesting in this research is the fact that researchers are taking into consideration that signs can vary depending on each user. Another aspect that is very notorious is the ability of this system to translate sign language to real words in real-time. This feature allows deaf users to communicate using the simplest signs of the collection of sign language to establish a simple conversation with people that knows nothing about sign language. It makes use of very simple artifacts that we use in our daily lives such as a video camera. It captures images that are interpreted and matched with a sign. It is worth mentioning that this system can be scalable and adaptable to other sign languages. Its architecture allows other users to train the system to work with different sign languages. According to the author of the article, this system is designed with peculiar care due to the different contexts in which the system can be used. The researchers have worked hard to find a harmony between the environment that surrounds the system: light, shadows, speed at which the sign is made, etc. Even though this is a very promising project, designers of the visual system assured that it can not handle many signs yet. The reason is that it can confuse some signs but development is on its way. They are trying to implement the system using two cameras two recognize more complex signs. In conclusion, projects that make life easier for those that are unable to participate in our communities or have a special need are exceptional ways to show that we can reach a harmony between humans and the environment that surround us. These types of projects create an environment where humans can be sure that their dignity will be protected. Technologies that want to make humans less human are worthless. We need to focus on creating technologies that will make members of our society more human instead of degrading human nature. This is a good example of technologies that make good use of information contained in the context. This system responds to the presence of a deaf person and it is worth mentioning that this will allow those members with special needs to integrate in a more natural and human way to our society.
Friday, June 25, 2010
Could humans be infected by 'computer viruses?'
This article was published about 2 months ago. Dr. Mark Gasson is the first person to have a computer chip (RFID) implanted in his left hand. It is inredible how new advances in the micro-technologies is helping researchers to accomplish better results in the area of Artificial Intelligence. An ethical question can be raised in opposition to the studies being done in the University of Reading. Implanting devices into te human body is not very ethical. If we read towards the end of the article we notice that this scientist provides very anti-human comments when he says "I believe it is necessary to acknowledge that our next evolutionary step may well mean that we all become part machine as we look to enhance ourselves." This is just ridiculous how we are going against human dignity. This is a serious problem that has to be approached with singular attention. There are many other ways that a smart building or any other smart environment can recognize a user. Implants are not the solution. Humans can not be transformed into machines, we have to protect the human righ of being fully human. I never thought a human was ever going to be infected y a computer virus. This sudy is a reflection of human stupidity. We have many issues affecting us and now we want to become vulnerable to computer viruses? This is a serious threat against human dignity. Let us take care of our current problems, we have enough, we do not need more problems.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)